Franklin D. Roosevelt: A Program for Social Security

Franklin D. Roosevelt: A Program for Social Security

▪ Primary Source
      

      Presidential advisers spent much of 1934 considering programs for unemployment compensation and old-age benefits—important planks in the Democratic platform of 1932. Unemployment compensation created numerous problems, largely because of conflict between advocates of a national plan and proponents of state-operated plans. Old-age insurance, having had no precedent in state legislation, was generally deemed suitable for a uniform federal program. In the following message to Congress of January 17, 1935, President Roosevelt presented the administration's proposal for a social security act. A bill was finally passed on August 14. Like most of the New Deal legislation, social security was challenged as unconstitutional, but in May 1937 the Supreme Court upheld the major provisions of the law.

      In addressing you on June 8, 1934, I summarized the main objectives of our American program. Among these was, and is, the security of the men, women, and children of the nation against certain hazards and vicissitudes of life. This purpose is an essential part of our task. In my annual message to you I promised to submit a definite program of action. This I do in the form of a report to me by a Committee on Economic Security, appointed by me for the purpose of surveying the field and of recommending the basis of legislation.

      I am gratified with the work of this committee and of those who have helped it: The Technical Board of Economic Security, drawn from various departments of the government; the Advisory Council on Economic Security, consisting of informed and public-spirited private citizens; and a number of other advisory groups, including a Committee on Actuarial Consultants, a Medical Advisory Board, a Dental Advisory Committee, a Hospital Advisory Committee, a Public Health Advisory Committee, a Child Welfare Committee, and an Advisory Committee on Employment Relief. All of those who participated in this notable task of planning this major legislative proposal are ready and willing at any time to consult with and assist in any way the appropriate congressional committees and members with respect to detailed aspects.

      It is my best judgment that this legislation should be brought forward with a minimum of delay. Federal action is necessary to and conditioned upon the actions of states. Forty-four legislatures are meeting or will meet soon. In order that the necessary state action may be taken promptly, it is important that the federal government proceed speedily.

      The detailed report of the committee sets forth a series of proposals that will appeal to the sound sense of the American people. It has not attempted the impossible nor has it failed to exercise sound caution and consideration of all of the factors concerned: the national credit, the rights and responsibilities of states, the capacity of industry to assume financial responsibilities, and the fundamental necessity of proceeding in a manner that will merit the enthusiastic support of citizens of all sorts.

      It is overwhelmingly important to avoid any danger of permanently discrediting the sound and necessary policy of federal legislation for economic security by attempting to apply it on too ambitious a scale before actual experience has provided guidance for the permanently safe direction of such efforts. The place of such a fundamental in our future civilization is too precious to be jeopardized now by extravagant action. It is a sound idea—a sound ideal. Most of the other advanced countries of the world have already adopted it, and their experience affords the knowledge that social insurance can be made a sound and workable project.

      Three principles should be observed in legislation on this subject. In the first place, the system adopted, except for the money necessary to initiate it, should be self-sustaining in the sense that funds for the payment of insurance benefits should not come from the proceeds of general taxation. Second, excepting in old-age insurance, actual management should be left to the states, subject to standards established by the federal government. Third, sound financial management of the funds and the reserves and protection of the credit structure of the nation should be assured by retaining federal control over all funds through trustees in the Treasury of the United States.

      At this time, I recommend the following types of legislation looking to economic security:

      First, unemployment compensation.

      Second, old-age benefits, including compulsory and voluntary annuities.

      Third, federal aid to dependent children through grants to states for the support of existing mother's pension systems and for services for the protection and care of homeless, neglected, dependent, and crippled children.

      Fourth, additional federal aid to state and local public-health agencies and the strengthening of the federal Public Health Service. I am not at this time recommending the adoption of so-called health insurance, although groups representing the medical profession are cooperating with the federal government in the further study of the subject, and definite progress is being made.

      With respect to unemployment compensation, I have concluded that the most practical proposal is the levy of a uniform federal payroll tax, 90 percent of which should be allowed as an offset to employers contributing under a compulsory state unemployment compensation act. The purpose of this is to afford a requirement of a reasonably uniform character for all states cooperating with the federal government and to promote and encourage the passage of unemployment compensation laws in the states. The 10 percent not thus offset should be used to cover the costs of federal and state administration of this broad system. Thus, states will largely administer unemployment compensation, assisted and guided by the federal government.

      An unemployment compensation system should be constructed in such a way as to afford every practicable aid and incentive toward the larger purpose of employment stabilization. This can be helped by the intelligent planning of both public and private employment. It also can be helped by correlating the system with public employment so that a person who has exhausted his benefits may be eligible for some form of public work as is recommended in this report. Moreover, in order to encourage the stabilization of private employment, federal legislation should not foreclose the states from establishing means for inducing industries to afford an even greater stabilization of employment.

      In the important field of security for our old people, it seems necessary to adopt three principles—first, noncontributory old-age pensions for those who are now too old to build up their own insurance; it is, of course, clear that for perhaps thirty years to come funds will have to be provided by the states and the federal government to meet these pensions. Second, compulsory contributory annuities, which in time will establish a self-supporting system for those now young and for future generations. Third, voluntary contributory annuities by which individual initiative can increase the annual amounts received in old age. It is proposed that the federal government assume one-half of the cost of the old-age pension plan, which ought ultimately to be supplanted by self-supporting annuity plans.

      The amount necessary at this time for the initiation of unemployment compensation, old-age security, children's aid, and the promotion of public health, as outlined in the report of the Committee on Economic Security, is approximately $100 million.

      The establishment of sound means toward a greater future economic security of the American people is dictated by a prudent consideration of the hazards involved in our national life. No one can guarantee this country against the dangers of future depressions, but we can reduce these dangers. We can eliminate many of the factors that cause economic depressions and we can provide the means of mitigating their results. This plan for economic security is at once a measure of prevention and a method of alleviation.

      We pay now for the dreadful consequence of economic insecurity—and dearly. This plan presents a more equitable and infinitely less expensive means of meeting these costs. We cannot afford to neglect the plain duty before us. I strongly recommend action to attain the objectives sought in this report.

Source: Congressional Record, 74 Cong., 1 Sess., pp. 545-546.

* * *


Universalium. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Social Security Administration — Official seal Agency overview Formed August 14, 1935 Jurisdiction …   Wikipedia

  • Social Security (United States) — This article is about the retirement/disability program. For the general concept of providing welfare, see Social security. For other uses, see Social Security (disambiguation) …   Wikipedia

  • Roosevelt, Franklin D. — ▪ president of United States Introduction in full  Franklin Delano Roosevelt,  byname  FDR   born January 30, 1882, Hyde Park, New York, U.S. died April 12, 1945, Warm Springs, Georgia  32nd president of the United States (1933–45). The only… …   Universalium

  • Franklin D. Roosevelt — Franklin Delano Roosevelt Pour les articles homonymes, voir Roosevelt. Franklin Delano Roosevelt …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Franklin D. Roosevelt — Infobox President name=Franklin Delano Roosevelt order=32nd President of the United States term start= March 4, 1933 term end= April 12, 1945 predecessor= Herbert Hoover successor= Harry S. Truman order2=44th Governor of New York term start2=… …   Wikipedia

  • Franklin Delano Roosevelt — Pour les articles homonymes, voir Delano et Roosevelt. Franklin Delano Roosevelt Franklin Delano Roosevelt, en 1933 …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Social Security Act of 1965 — The Social Security Amendments of 1965 was legislation in the United States whose most important provisions resulted in creation of two programs: Medicare and Medicaid. The legislation initially provided federal health insurance for the elderly… …   Wikipedia

  • Social Security Act — U.S. Govt. a law passed in 1935 providing old age retirement insurance, a federal state program of unemployment compensation, and federal grants for state welfare programs. * * * (Aug. 14, 1935) Legislation that established a national old age… …   Universalium

  • Social Security — A United States federal program of social insurance and benefits developed in 1935. The Social Security program s benefits include retirement income, disability income, Medicare and Medicaid, and death and survivorship benefits. Social Security… …   Investment dictionary

  • Franklin D. Roosevelt: Call for Federal Responsibility — ▪ Primary Source               What do the people of America want more than anything else? Franklin D. Roosevelt asked in his unprecedented speech before the Democratic Convention in Chicago that had just nominated him the presidential candidate …   Universalium

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”